People v. Alcahaz

46 A.D.3d 253, 847 N.Y.S.2d 61

This text of 46 A.D.3d 253 (People v. Alcahaz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Alcahaz, 46 A.D.3d 253, 847 N.Y.S.2d 61 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (William A. Wetzel, J.), which denied defendant’s motion for resentencing under the 2005 Drug Law Reform Act (L 2005, ch 643), unanimously affirmed.

The court properly exercised its discretion in determining that substantial justice dictated denial of the application. Defendant played a significant role in a large scale drug trafficking operation. Moreover, she had a prior federal drug conviction that resulted in her deportation, after which she illegally reentered the United States and committed the subject crime. Evidence of her rehabilitation while incarcerated did not overcome the factors militating against resentencing (see e.g. [254]*254People v Marte, 44 AD3d 442 [2007]). Concur—Lippman, P.J., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Buckley and Sweeny, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Marte
44 A.D.3d 442 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 A.D.3d 253, 847 N.Y.S.2d 61, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-alcahaz-nyappdiv-2007.