People v. Albino

280 A.D.2d 430, 721 N.Y.S.2d 502, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1917

This text of 280 A.D.2d 430 (People v. Albino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Albino, 280 A.D.2d 430, 721 N.Y.S.2d 502, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1917 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Felice Shea, J.), rendered April 23, 1999, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and attempted assault in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 7 years, unanimously affirmed.

Since defendant did not move to withdraw his plea, and since his motion to vacate judgment was made on different grounds, his challenges to his plea allocution are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find that the record establishes that defendant entered his plea knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9).

Defendant’s claims that he received ineffective assistance of counsel and that his plea was thus rendered involuntary rest on factual assertions dehors the record, particularly as to conversations between defendant and counsel. Accordingly, defendant’s claims are unreviewable (see, People v Ramos, 63 NY2d 640, 643). Moreover, defendant made a motion to vacate judgment pursuant to CPL 440.10 alleging ineffective assistance, but failed to include his present factual assertions. In any event, that motion was denied and leave to appeal to this Court was likewise denied. To the extent that the existing record permits review, it establishes that defendant received meaningful representation (see, People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 404).

Defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them. Concur — Mazzarelli, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Rubin and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Ford
657 N.E.2d 265 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
People v. Harris
459 N.E.2d 170 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Ramos
468 N.E.2d 692 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
280 A.D.2d 430, 721 N.Y.S.2d 502, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-albino-nyappdiv-2001.