People v. Albany & Vermont Railroad
This text of 16 Abb. Pr. 465 (People v. Albany & Vermont Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By section 308 of the Code, in addition to the allowance provided for by section 307, the plaintiff', upon the recovery of judgment by him in certain actions, is allowed a percentage on the amount of the recovery. By section 309 these rates are to be estimated upon the value of the property claimed, &c., and upon the amount found due [466]*466in case of a mortgage foreclosure. The concluding portion of the same section is as follows: “ In difficult and extraordinary eases, when a trial has been had, 1 except’ in any of the actions or proceedings specified in section three hundred and eight, the court may, also in its discretion, make a further allowance to any party, not exceeding five per cent, upon the amount of the recovery or claim, or subject-matter imolved.” It must be conceded that this is a “ difficult and extraordinary” case within the meaning of the clause last cited. The “ subject-matter involved” in the controversy was the operating and repairing of the road in question. The amount of the subject-matter affected by it and involved in it, was of. the value' of $50,000. The suit was brought to prevent the removal of property of the road of larger value, and to compel a reconstruction, involving a heavy expense. An injunction was obtained, and the controversy was terminated by a successful defence. It appears to me that this is a ease clearly within the intentt meaning, and spirit of the clause above cited, and was of such a character as to authorize an extra allowance. I think, therefore, that the order made at special term should be affirmed, with ten dollars .costs of appeal.
Present, Hobeboom, Peckham, and Milieb, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 Abb. Pr. 465, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-albany-vermont-railroad-nysupct-1862.