People v. Alameda

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Alameda

194 A.D.2d 390, 599 N.Y.S.2d 951, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5913

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 10, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 194 A.D.2d 390 (People v. Alameda) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Alameda, 194 A.D.2d 390, 599 N.Y.S.2d 951, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5913 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Robert L. Cohen, J.), rendered April 23, 1991, which convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentenced him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4 Vi to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant failed to preserve his claim that the prosecutor elicited testimony of an uncharged crime (CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Russell, 179 AD2d 521, 522), and that the prosecutor’s summation deprived him of a fair trial. We decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review, we would find both claims to be without merit. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Ellerin and Asch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Robert L. Cohen, J.), rendered April 23, 1991, which convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentenced him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4 Vi to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant failed to preserve his claim that the prosecutor elicited testimony of an uncharged crime (CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Russell, 179 AD2d 521, 522), and that the prosecutor’s summation deprived him of a fair trial. We decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review, we would find both claims to be without merit. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Ellerin and Asch, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

194 A.D.2d 390, 599 N.Y.S.2d 951, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-alameda-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack