People v. Akel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Akel

9 A.D.2d 780, 193 N.Y.S.2d 95, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6106

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 16, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 9 A.D.2d 780 (People v. Akel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Akel, 9 A.D.2d 780, 193 N.Y.S.2d 95, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6106 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Kings County, rendered February 11, 1958, sentencing appellant to serve from 2% to 5 years, after he had been found guilty by a jury of being an accessory to a felony (Penal Law, § 2). The notice of appeal states that appeal is also taken from “ all of the objections, exceptions and motions made during the trial, after trial, and from all intermediate orders made in this matter”. Judgment unanimously affirmed. (See People v. Maimone, 9 A D 2d 780.) No separate appeal lies from the objections, the exceptions or the intermediate orders, which have been reviewed on the- appeal from the judgment of conviction. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Kings County, rendered February 11, 1958, sentencing appellant to serve from 2% to 5 years, after he had been found guilty by a jury of being an accessory to a felony (Penal Law, § 2). The notice of appeal states that appeal is also taken from “ all of the objections, exceptions and motions made during the trial, after trial, and from all intermediate orders made in this matter”. Judgment unanimously affirmed. (See People v. Maimone, 9 A D 2d 780.) No separate appeal lies from the objections, the exceptions or the intermediate orders, which have been reviewed on the- appeal from the judgment of conviction. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 A.D.2d 780, 193 N.Y.S.2d 95, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-akel-nyappdiv-1959.