People v. Aitcheson

2026 NY Slip Op 00142
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 14, 2026
DocketInd. No. 71363/21
StatusPublished

This text of 2026 NY Slip Op 00142 (People v. Aitcheson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Aitcheson, 2026 NY Slip Op 00142 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

People v Aitcheson (2026 NY Slip Op 00142)
People v Aitcheson
2026 NY Slip Op 00142
Decided on January 14, 2026
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on January 14, 2026 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
COLLEEN D. DUFFY, J.P.
LARA J. GENOVESI
WILLIAM G. FORD
JANICE A. TAYLOR
JAMES P. MCCORMACK, JJ.

2023-12283
(Ind. No. 71363/21)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Everette A. Aitcheson, appellant.


Laurette D. Mulry, Riverhead, NY (Genevieve M. Cahill of counsel), for appellant.

Raymond A. Tierney, District Attorney, Riverhead, NY (Rosalind C. Gray of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County (Richard I. Horowitz, J.), imposed November 15, 2023, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

Contrary to the People's contention, the record does not demonstrate that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal under the totality of the circumstances (see People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545, 559; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256). Accordingly, the purported waiver does not preclude appellate review of the defendant's excessive sentence claim (see People v Clark, 217 AD3d 964).

However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

DUFFY, J.P., GENOVESI, FORD, TAYLOR and MCCORMACK, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Clark
190 N.Y.S.3d 163 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2026 NY Slip Op 00142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-aitcheson-nyappdiv-2026.