People v. Aiken

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Aiken

38 A.D.2d 832, 329 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5440

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 7, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 38 A.D.2d 832 (People v. Aiken) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Aiken, 38 A.D.2d 832, 329 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5440 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

In a coram nobis proceeding, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 17, 1969, which denied the application without a hearing. Order affirmed. In his petition, defendant alleged that he was not advised of his right to appeal from the judgment of conviction attacked by this proceeding, which judgment was rendered on October 29, 1948. The judgment convicted him of attempted burglary in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty. Defendant requested a hearing on this issue pursuant to People v. Montgomery (24 N Y 2d 130) and a resentence nunc pro tunc as of October 29, 1948 so that his time to appeal would run anew. He further requested that he be given the opportunity to represent himself at such hearing. However, the record indicates that he was resentenced on November 6, 1968, nunc pro tunc as of October 29, 1948, for this conviction due to the failure of the trial court, at the time of the original sentence on October 29, 1948, to give him the allocution mandated by section 480 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. An appeal was taken from that judgment of resentence and this court affirmed (People v. Aiken, 32 A D 2d 889). Consequently, defendant’s contention is without merit. Munder, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Shapiro and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a coram nobis proceeding, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 17, 1969, which denied the application without a hearing. Order affirmed. In his petition, defendant alleged that he was not advised of his right to appeal from the judgment of conviction attacked by this proceeding, which judgment was rendered on October 29, 1948. The judgment convicted him of attempted burglary in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty. Defendant requested a hearing on this issue pursuant to People v. Montgomery (24 N Y 2d 130) and a resentence nunc pro tunc as of October 29, 1948 so that his time to appeal would run anew. He further requested that he be given the opportunity to represent himself at such hearing. However, the record indicates that he was resentenced on November 6, 1968, nunc pro tunc as of October 29, 1948, for this conviction due to the failure of the trial court, at the time of the original sentence on October 29, 1948, to give him the allocution mandated by section 480 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. An appeal was taken from that judgment of resentence and this court affirmed (People v. Aiken, 32 A D 2d 889). Consequently, defendant’s contention is without merit. Munder, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Shapiro and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 A.D.2d 832, 329 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-aiken-nyappdiv-1972.