People v. Aiagon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Aiagon

129 A.D.2d 647, 513 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45325

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 13, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 129 A.D.2d 647 (People v. Aiagon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Aiagon, 129 A.D.2d 647, 513 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45325 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hayes, J.), rendered April 22, 1985, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The hearing court properly determined that the evidence seized from the defendant should not be suppressed. The officer who seized the evidence acted properly, pursuant to a valid stop and frisk, relying on clear and articulable facts that he was in danger (see, People v De Bour, 40 NY2d 210; People v Watson, 96 AD2d 1066). Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Eiber and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hayes, J.), rendered April 22, 1985, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The hearing court properly determined that the evidence seized from the defendant should not be suppressed. The officer who seized the evidence acted properly, pursuant to a valid stop and frisk, relying on clear and articulable facts that he was in danger (see, People v De Bour, 40 NY2d 210; People v Watson, 96 AD2d 1066). Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Eiber and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

129 A.D.2d 647, 513 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-aiagon-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack