People v. Ahern

California Supreme Court

People v. Ahern

29 P. 49, 93 Cal. 518, 1892 Cal. LEXIS 592

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 3, 1892

DocketNo. 20862

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 29 P. 49 (People v. Ahern) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Ahern, 29 P. 49, 93 Cal. 518, 1892 Cal. LEXIS 592 (Cal. 1892).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court.

Defendant was convicted of the crime of robbery, and appeals from the judgment and order denying his motion for a new trial.

The evidence is sufficient to support the verdict, and we find no merit in the assignment of errors of law. If the defendant desired to have the jury instructed as to the definition of reasonable doubt, it was his duty to have asked for such instruction. (People v. Christensen, 85 Cal. 571.)

Let the judgment and order be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court.

Defendant was convicted of the crime of robbery, and appeals from the judgment and order denying his motion for a new trial.

The evidence is sufficient to support the verdict, and we find no merit in the assignment of errors of law. If the defendant desired to have the jury instructed as to the definition of reasonable doubt, it was his duty to have asked for such instruction. (People v. Christensen, 85 Cal. 571.)

Let the judgment and order be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 P. 49, 93 Cal. 518, 1892 Cal. LEXIS 592, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ahern-cal-1892.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack