People v. Ahern
29 P. 49, 93 Cal. 518, 1892 Cal. LEXIS 592
Opinion
Defendant was convicted of the crime of robbery, and appeals from the judgment and order denying his motion for a new trial.
The evidence is sufficient to support the verdict, and we find no merit in the assignment of errors of law. If the defendant desired to have the jury instructed as to the definition of reasonable doubt, it was his duty to have asked for such instruction. (People v. Christensen, 85 Cal. 571.)
Let the judgment and order be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Ahern, 29 P. 49, 93 Cal. 518, 1892 Cal. LEXIS 592 (Cal. 1892).
29 P. 49 (People v. Ahern) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Gordon
163 P.2d 110 (California Court of Appeal, 1945)
People v. Fowler
174 P. 892 (California Supreme Court, 1918)
People v. Rogers
126 P. 143 (California Supreme Court, 1912)
Smith v. State
101 P. 847 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1909)