People v. Ah Ti
9 Cal. 16
Opinion
The defendant was convicted of grand larceny. The only error assigned is that the testimony did not justify the verdict.
The rule is well settled that where there is no legal testimony to sustain the verdict, it will be set aside; but where the testimony is conflicting, or where the credibility of witnesses must be passed upon, it is a matter solely for the jury to determine. In this case, we think the jury might have found the defendant guilty or not guilty, and the Court would not have been justified in granting a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Ah Ti, 9 Cal. 16 (Cal. 1858).
9 Cal. 16 (People v. Ah Ti) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Guardian Alliance Technologies, Inc. v. Miller Mendel, Inc.
E.D. California, 2025
Rossi v. Caire
180 P. 58 (California Court of Appeal, 1919)
In Re Estate of Pusey
170 P. 846 (California Supreme Court, 1918)
Ward v. Marshall
30 P. 1113 (California Supreme Court, 1892)
Clark v. Hershy
52 Ark. 473 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1889)
Adams v. Smith
6 Dakota 94 (Supreme Court of Dakota, 1889)
Myers v. McDonald
8 P. 809 (California Supreme Court, 1885)
Ryan v. Tomlinson
39 Cal. 639 (California Supreme Court, 1870)
Argenti v. City of San Francisco
30 Cal. 458 (California Supreme Court, 1866)