People v. Ah Loy
10 Cal. 301
Opinion
C. J., and Baldwin, J., concurring.
The defendant was convicted of the crime of robbery. A motion for a new trial was made, on the ground that the verdict was against the evidence, and was overruled, and the defendant appealed.
It requires a clear case—one in which there is an absence of evidence against the prisoner, or a decided preponderance of evidence in his favor—to justify an interference with the verdict of the jury. In the present case, the evidence was ample, and the conflict in the statements of the witnesses slight.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Ah Loy, 10 Cal. 301 (Cal. 1858).
10 Cal. 301 (People v. Ah Loy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ford v. Ford
186 P. 164 (California Court of Appeal, 1919)
People v. Trigaros
183 P. 668 (California Court of Appeal, 1919)
People v. Durrant
48 P. 75 (California Supreme Court, 1897)
Territory of Arizona v. Miramontez
36 P. 35 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1894)
Territory of Arizona v. Booth
36 P. 38 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1894)
Territory v. Edie
6 N.M. 555 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1892)
United States v. Haris
5 Utah 621 (Utah Supreme Court, 1888)
People v. Jones
8 P. 611 (California Supreme Court, 1885)
Phillips v. Territory of Wyoming
1 Wyo. 82 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1872)
People v. Brown
27 Cal. 500 (California Supreme Court, 1865)