People v. Aguirre

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Aguirre

269 A.D.2d 457, 702 N.Y.S.2d 921, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1352

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 14, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 269 A.D.2d 457 (People v. Aguirre) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Aguirre, 269 A.D.2d 457, 702 N.Y.S.2d 921, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1352 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Robinson, J.), rendered April 2, 1998, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, robbery in the first degree (four counts), robbery in the second degree (two counts), [458]*458assault in the first degree, assault in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt is not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]). Sullivan, J. P., S. Miller, Friedmann and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Robinson, J.), rendered April 2, 1998, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, robbery in the first degree (four counts), robbery in the second degree (two counts), [458]*458assault in the first degree, assault in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt is not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]). Sullivan, J. P., S. Miller, Friedmann and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

269 A.D.2d 457, 702 N.Y.S.2d 921, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-aguirre-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack