People v. Agudelo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Agudelo

202 A.D.2d 799, 609 N.Y.S.2d 874, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2547

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 17, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 202 A.D.2d 799 (People v. Agudelo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Agudelo, 202 A.D.2d 799, 609 N.Y.S.2d 874, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2547 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Casey, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Ulster County (Vogt, J.), rendered June 18, 1992, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree.

[800]*800Defendant was indicted for criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree, criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree (two counts) and various other lesser counts of sale and possession of controlled substances. Although charged with a class A-I felony, defendant was allowed to plead to criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, a class A-II felony, in full satisfaction of the indictment and with a prison sentence of eight years to life. Defendant accepted the plea as offered and was sentenced as agreed. On this appeal he contends that his sentence was unduly harsh.

Inasmuch as defendant was facing a potential prison sentence ranging from 15 years to life up to 25 years to life if convicted as charged, we find the plea to the reduced charge and the sentence imposed to have been advantageous to defendant’s interests. The claim of excessiveness is untenable.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Weiss and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Casey, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Ulster County (Vogt, J.), rendered June 18, 1992, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree.

[800]*800Defendant was indicted for criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree, criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree (two counts) and various other lesser counts of sale and possession of controlled substances. Although charged with a class A-I felony, defendant was allowed to plead to criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, a class A-II felony, in full satisfaction of the indictment and with a prison sentence of eight years to life. Defendant accepted the plea as offered and was sentenced as agreed. On this appeal he contends that his sentence was unduly harsh.

Inasmuch as defendant was facing a potential prison sentence ranging from 15 years to life up to 25 years to life if convicted as charged, we find the plea to the reduced charge and the sentence imposed to have been advantageous to defendant’s interests. The claim of excessiveness is untenable.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Weiss and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

202 A.D.2d 799, 609 N.Y.S.2d 874, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2547, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-agudelo-nyappdiv-1994.