People v. Agro
This text of 259 A.D. 1091 (People v. Agro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment of the County Court of Kings County, convicting appeUant of the crime of criminaUy receiving stolen property, reversed on the law, indictment against appellant dismissed, and appeUant discharged from custody. The testimony of the witness Randisi was such as to estabUsh as a matter of law that he was an accompUce of the appeUant, within the tests laid down in People v. Cohen (223 N. Y. 406) and People v. Kupperschmidt (237 id. 463). The testimony of the accompUce was not corroborated and appeUant’s motion to dismiss the indictment should have been granted. (Code Crim. Proc. § 399.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
259 A.D. 1091, 21 N.Y.S.2d 289, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-agro-nyappdiv-1940.