People v. Agramonte

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Agramonte

256 A.D.2d 22, 680 N.Y.S.2d 845, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12904

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 1, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 256 A.D.2d 22 (People v. Agramonte) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Agramonte, 256 A.D.2d 22, 680 N.Y.S.2d 845, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12904 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgments, Supreme Court, New York County (Laura Drager, J.), rendered February 5, 1996, convicting defendant, upon his pleas of guilty, of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 4 to 8 years, unanimously modified, on the law, to [23]*23reduce the sentence on the conviction for attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree to a term of 22/s to 8 years, and otherwise affirmed.

As the People correctly concede, defendant was improperly sentenced as a second felony offender on his conviction for attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree. Accordingly, we modify the sentence to 22/s to 8 years. We decline to make any further reduction of defendant’s sentence. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Wallach and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgments, Supreme Court, New York County (Laura Drager, J.), rendered February 5, 1996, convicting defendant, upon his pleas of guilty, of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 4 to 8 years, unanimously modified, on the law, to [23]*23reduce the sentence on the conviction for attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree to a term of 22/s to 8 years, and otherwise affirmed.

As the People correctly concede, defendant was improperly sentenced as a second felony offender on his conviction for attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree. Accordingly, we modify the sentence to 22/s to 8 years. We decline to make any further reduction of defendant’s sentence. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Wallach and Tom, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 A.D.2d 22, 680 N.Y.S.2d 845, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12904, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-agramonte-nyappdiv-1998.