People v. Agha

41 A.D.3d 1324, 840 N.Y.S.2d 881
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Agha. Read the opinion of the Court — 37 A.D.3d 1202

Opinion

Motion for reargument granted and, upon reargument, the memorandum and order entered February 2, 2007 (37 AD 3d 1202 [2007]) is amended by deleting the first two sentences of the fifth paragraph of the memorandum and substituting the following sentence: “With respect to those parts of defendants’ motions to suppress the evidence obtained as a result of the eavesdropping warrants, the suppression court determined that the People ‘may have shown’ that they had probable cause to obtain the warrants, but it nevertheless determined that the People failed to establish that normal investigative procedures had been tried and had failed, or that they ‘reasonably appeared] to be unlikely to succeed if tried’ (CPL 700.15 [4]).” Present—Scudder, P.J, Martoche, Centra and Pine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Agha, 41 A.D.3d 1324, 840 N.Y.S.2d 881 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

41 A.D.3d 1324 (People v. Agha) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Agha
37 A.D.3d 1202 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)