People v. Aessa

29 A.D.3d 1016, 815 N.Y.S.2d 482
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 30, 2006·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Buchter, J.), rendered August 6, 2004, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the trier of fact, which saw and heard the witnesses (see People v Gaimari, 176 NY 84 [1903]). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record (see People v Garafolo, 44 AD2d 86, 88 [1974]). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Adams, J.P., Santucci, Lunn and Dillon, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Aessa, 29 A.D.3d 1016, 815 N.Y.S.2d 482 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

29 A.D.3d 1016 (People v. Aessa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lopez
40 A.D.3d 1119 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Olson
35 A.D.3d 890 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)