People v. Adorno

2019 NY Slip Op 2754
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 11, 2019
Docket109287
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 2754 (People v. Adorno) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Adorno, 2019 NY Slip Op 2754 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

People v Adorno (2019 NY Slip Op 02754)
People v Adorno
2019 NY Slip Op 02754
Decided on April 11, 2019
Appellate Division, Third Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: April 11, 2019

109287

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,

v

FERNANDO ADORNO, Appellant.


Calendar Date: March 15, 2019
Before: Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Mulvey, Devine and Pritzker, JJ.

Justin C. Brusgul, Voorheesville, for appellant.

D. Holley Carnright, District Attorney, Kingston (Joan Gudesblatt Lamb of counsel), for respondent.



MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Ulster County (Williams, J.), rendered January 18, 2017, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of burglary in the second degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to burglary in the second degree and waived the right to appeal. County Court thereafter imposed the agreed-upon sentence of 4½ years in prison, to be followed by five years of postrelease supervision. Defendant appeals.

We affirm. Defendant's sole argument on appeal is that his sentence is harsh and excessive. This argument is precluded by defendant's unchallenged waiver of the right to appeal (see People v Valachovic, 163 AD3d 1351, 1351-1352 [2018]; People v Chapman, 160 AD3d 1211, 1211 [2018]). Therefore, the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Mulvey, Devine and Pritzker, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 431
New York JUD § 431

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 2754, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-adorno-nyappdiv-2019.