People v. Adorno

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Adorno

128 A.D.2d 712, 512 N.Y.S.2d 785, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 44395

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 16, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 128 A.D.2d 712 (People v. Adorno) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Adorno, 128 A.D.2d 712, 512 N.Y.S.2d 785, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 44395 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hellenbrand, J.), rendered December 18, 1984, convicting him of murder in the second degree (four counts), criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Upon viewing the evidence, as we must, in the light most favorable to the prosecution, we find that it is sufficient as a matter of law to support the defendant’s conviction of the crimes charged (see, People v Malizia, 62 NY2d 755, cert denied 469 US 932; People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power we are satisfied that the evidence was of sufficient quality and quantity to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (CPL 470.15 [5]).

We have considered the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Mangano, J. P., Brown, Niehoff and Fiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hellenbrand, J.), rendered December 18, 1984, convicting him of murder in the second degree (four counts), criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Upon viewing the evidence, as we must, in the light most favorable to the prosecution, we find that it is sufficient as a matter of law to support the defendant’s conviction of the crimes charged (see, People v Malizia, 62 NY2d 755, cert denied 469 US 932; People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power we are satisfied that the evidence was of sufficient quality and quantity to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (CPL 470.15 [5]).

We have considered the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Mangano, J. P., Brown, Niehoff and Fiber, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

128 A.D.2d 712, 512 N.Y.S.2d 785, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 44395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-adorno-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack