People v. Adon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Adon

215 A.D.2d 237, 626 N.Y.S.2d 444, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5182

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 16, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 215 A.D.2d 237 (People v. Adon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Adon, 215 A.D.2d 237, 626 N.Y.S.2d 444, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5182 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Martin Marcus, J.), rendered June 15, 1992, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 3 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621), the jury verdict was not against the weight of the evidence since the minor inconsistencies in the officers’ testimony were explained since one officer observed defendant toss the gun in a garbage can (see, People v Hernandez, 173 AD2d 382, Iv denied 78 NY2d 967).

Further, we perceive no abuse of discretion in the sentence imposed. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Wallach, Rubin, Kupferman and Asch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Martin Marcus, J.), rendered June 15, 1992, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 3 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621), the jury verdict was not against the weight of the evidence since the minor inconsistencies in the officers’ testimony were explained since one officer observed defendant toss the gun in a garbage can (see, People v Hernandez, 173 AD2d 382, Iv denied 78 NY2d 967).

Further, we perceive no abuse of discretion in the sentence imposed. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Wallach, Rubin, Kupferman and Asch, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

215 A.D.2d 237, 626 N.Y.S.2d 444, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-adon-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack