People v. Adiansingh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Adiansingh

220 A.D.2d 518, 632 N.Y.S.2d 482, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9907

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 10, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 220 A.D.2d 518 (People v. Adiansingh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Adiansingh, 220 A.D.2d 518, 632 N.Y.S.2d 482, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9907 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the [519]*519defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Orenstein, J.), rendered October 4, 1993, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, on the facts of this case, the prosecutor’s comment on the defendant’s failure to call the defendant’s brother as a witness did not deprive him of a fair trial (see, People v Johnson, 167 AD2d 422; People v Shaw, 112 AD2d 958).

The defendant’s remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, is without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Joy, Altman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the [519]*519defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Orenstein, J.), rendered October 4, 1993, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, on the facts of this case, the prosecutor’s comment on the defendant’s failure to call the defendant’s brother as a witness did not deprive him of a fair trial (see, People v Johnson, 167 AD2d 422; People v Shaw, 112 AD2d 958).

The defendant’s remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, is without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Joy, Altman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

220 A.D.2d 518, 632 N.Y.S.2d 482, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9907, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-adiansingh-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack