People v. Adeola
82 A.D.3d 1258, 919 N.Y.2d 369
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Adeola. Read the opinion of the Court — 51 A.D.3d 811 →
Opinion
The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion for resentencing pursuant to the Drug Law Reform Act of 2004 (L 2004, ch 738, § 23). The Supreme Court properly considered, among other things, the defendant’s status as a high-level member of a drug trafficking enterprise. Under the circumstances, substantial justice dictated the denial of the motion (see People v Winfield, 59 AD3d 747, 748 [2009]). Florio, J.P, Dickerson, Leventhal and Belen, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Adeola, 82 A.D.3d 1258, 919 N.Y.2d 369 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).
82 A.D.3d 1258 (People v. Adeola) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Winfield
59 A.D.3d 747 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)