People v. Adams

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 5, 2026
Docket272 KA 23-00565
StatusPublished

This text of People v. Adams (People v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Adams, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

People v Adams - 2026 NY Slip Op 03541
skip to main content

It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website.

Law Reporting
Bureau
Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter

People v Adams

2026 NY Slip Op 03541

June 5, 2026

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

MICHAEL ADAMS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

Decided on June 5, 2026

272 KA 23-00565

Present: Whalen, P.J., Bannister, Montour, Greenwood, And Hannah, JJ.

JULIE CIANCA, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (JANE I. YOON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

BRIAN P. GREEN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (LISA GRAY OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Douglas A. Randall, J.), rendered February 21, 2023. The judgment revoked defendant's sentence of probation and imposed a sentence of incarceration.

[*1]

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment revoking the sentence of probation imposed upon his conviction, following his plea of guilty, of driving while intoxicated as a class E felony (Vehicle and Traffic Law §§ 1192 [3]; 1193 [1] [c] [i] [A]) and sentencing him to a term of incarceration. Defendant's sole contention is that the sentence is unduly harsh and severe. Inasmuch as defendant has completed serving that sentence, the appeal is moot (see People v Linn, 194 AD3d 1420, 1420-1421 [4th Dept 2021], lv denied 37 NY3d 973 [2021]; People v Pompeo, 151 AD3d 1949, 1949-1950 [4th Dept 2017], lv denied 29 NY3d 1132 [2017]).

Entered: June 5, 2026

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court

Court Decisions

All Court Decisions Official Reports Service Bound Volumes Decision Search

Resources

RSS Feeds Style Manual Citation Tools Opinion Formatting & Privacy Guidelines Opinion Selection Criteria Legal Research Portal Site Index

About

About the Law Reporting Bureau About our Operations Contact Us Twitter

Quick Contact Info

17 Lodge Street

Albany, NY 12207

Phone: (518) 453-6900

Links to or from other sites do not signify endorsement or relationship with them.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Pompeo
2017 NY Slip Op 5367 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
People v. Linn
2021 NY Slip Op 02940 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
People v. Adams, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-adams-nyappdiv-2026.