People v. Adams

83 A.D.3d 679, 919 N.Y.S.2d 903
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Adams. Read the opinion of the Court — 66 A.D.3d 1355

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Westchester County (Cacace, J.), dated March 11, 2010, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

[680]*680Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The County Court’s designation of the defendant as a level three sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration Act was supported by clear and convincing evidence (see Correction Law § 168-n [3]; People v Mendez, 79 AD3d 834 [2010], lv denied 16 NY3d 707 [2011]; People v Vega, 79 AD3d 718 [2010]; People v Niola, 50 AD3d 991 [2008]; see generally People v Mingo, 12 NY3d 563 [2009]). Angiolillo, J.P., Florio, Belen and Austin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Adams, 83 A.D.3d 679, 919 N.Y.S.2d 903 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

83 A.D.3d 679 (People v. Adams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Mingo
910 N.E.2d 983 (New York Court of Appeals, 2009)
People v. Niola
50 A.D.3d 991 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. Vega
79 A.D.3d 718 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)