People v. Adams

67 A.D.3d 819, 887 N.Y.S.2d 859
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 10, 2009·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hollie, J.), rendered May 15, 2007, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal does not preclude him from challenging the voluntariness of his plea (see People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 10 [1989]; People v Morrow, 48 AD3d 704, 705 [2008]). However, the defendant’s contention that his plea was not knowingly and voluntarily made is unpreserved for appellate review because he never moved to withdraw his plea or vacate the judgment of conviction (see People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665-666 [1988]; People v Velez, 64 AD3d 799 [2009]; People v Bolton, 63 AD3d 1087 [2009]; People v Antoine, 59 AD3d 560 [2009]; People v Rufa, 57 AD3d 697 [2008]; People v Luster, 45 AD3d 866 [2007]), and we decline to review the issue in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. Mastro, J.P., Balkin, Eng and Leventhal, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Adams, 67 A.D.3d 819, 887 N.Y.S.2d 859 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

67 A.D.3d 819 (People v. Adams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Edmunson
109 A.D.3d 621 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People v. Kitt
102 A.D.3d 984 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People v. Cohen
100 A.D.3d 919 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
People v. Timberlake
82 A.D.3d 1134 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)