People v. Adams

154 A.D.2d 891, 545 N.Y.S.2d 859, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12833
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Adams. Read the opinion of the Court — 123 A.D.2d 769

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Contrary to defendant’s assertion on appeal, he was not in custody at the time he voluntarily agreed to accompany the police investigator to the police station for the purpose of viewing a photo array of the alleged assailant (see, People v Yukl, 25 NY2d 585, 589, mot to amend remittitur denied 26 NY2d 883, cert denied 400 US 851). The evidence adduced at the Huntley hearing supports the suppression court’s finding that defendant was given his Miranda warnings before he was subjected to the custodial interrogation which led to his confession. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Wisner, J. — conspiracy, second degree, and other charges.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Denman, Boomer, Green and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Adams, 154 A.D.2d 891, 545 N.Y.S.2d 859, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12833 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

154 A.D.2d 891 (People v. Adams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Yukl
256 N.E.2d 172 (New York Court of Appeals, 1969)
People v. Cooper
258 N.E.2d 216 (New York Court of Appeals, 1970)