People v. Adams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Adams

21 A.D.2d 898, 252 N.Y.S.2d 302, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3277

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 9, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 21 A.D.2d 898 (People v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Adams, 21 A.D.2d 898, 252 N.Y.S.2d 302, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3277 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the former County Court, Kings County, rendered October 20, 1961 after a jury trial, [899]*899convicting him of burglary in the third degree and of petit larceny, and: (a) imposing a sentence of three to six years on the burglary count; and (b) suspending sentence on the petit larceny count. Defendant was tried jointly with a codefendant, Rafael Negron. Judgment modified on the facts by reducing the sentence to the time already served. As so modified, judgment affirmed. Defendant has already served the minimum of his term. Under all the circumstances disclosed by the instant record, the sentence was excessive; it should be reduced to the time already served. (For companion appeal, People v. Negron, 21 A D 2d 904.) Beldoek, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the former County Court, Kings County, rendered October 20, 1961 after a jury trial, [899]*899convicting him of burglary in the third degree and of petit larceny, and: (a) imposing a sentence of three to six years on the burglary count; and (b) suspending sentence on the petit larceny count. Defendant was tried jointly with a codefendant, Rafael Negron. Judgment modified on the facts by reducing the sentence to the time already served. As so modified, judgment affirmed. Defendant has already served the minimum of his term. Under all the circumstances disclosed by the instant record, the sentence was excessive; it should be reduced to the time already served. (For companion appeal, People v. Negron, 21 A D 2d 904.) Beldoek, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 A.D.2d 898, 252 N.Y.S.2d 302, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-adams-nyappdiv-1964.