People v. Adames

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Adames

154 A.D.2d 605

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Adames. Read the opinion of the Court — 168 A.D.2d 623 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 23, 1989·Published

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cooper-man, J.), rendered February 1, 1988, convicting her of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues [606]*606which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Brown, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cooper-man, J.), rendered February 1, 1988, convicting her of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues [606]*606which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Brown, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.

People v. Adames, 154 A.D.2d 605 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

154 A.D.2d 605 (People v. Adames) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related