People v. Acosta

186 N.Y.S.3d 759, 215 A.D.3d 1246, 2023 NY Slip Op 02208
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 28, 2023
Docket173 KA 18-01536
StatusPublished

This text of 186 N.Y.S.3d 759 (People v. Acosta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Acosta, 186 N.Y.S.3d 759, 215 A.D.3d 1246, 2023 NY Slip Op 02208 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

People v Acosta (2023 NY Slip Op 02208)
People v Acosta
2023 NY Slip Op 02208
Decided on April 28, 2023
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on April 28, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, CURRAN, BANNISTER, AND MONTOUR, JJ.

173 KA 18-01536

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

MARIA J. ACOSTA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.


ERIK TEIFKE, ACTING PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (TIMOTHY S. DAVIS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (SCOTT MYLES OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.



Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Christopher S. Ciaccio, J.), rendered May 9, 2018. The judgment convicted defendant upon a plea of guilty of arson in the second degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting her upon her plea of guilty of arson in the second degree (Penal Law § 150.15), defendant contends that her waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and that her sentence is unduly harsh and severe. Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant's waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and does not preclude our review of her challenge to the severity of the sentence (see People v Seay, 201 AD3d 1361, 1361-1362 [4th Dept 2022]), we perceive no basis in the record to exercise our power to modify the sentence as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see CPL 470.15 [6] [b]).

Entered: April 28, 2023

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Seay
201 A.D.3d 1361 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
186 N.Y.S.3d 759, 215 A.D.3d 1246, 2023 NY Slip Op 02208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-acosta-nyappdiv-2023.