People v. Acosta

2018 NY Slip Op 8102
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Acosta. Read the opinion of the Court — 2020 NY Slip Op 07466
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 27, 2018·No. 7735 2873/15·Published

Opinion

People v Acosta (2018 NY Slip Op 08102)
People v Acosta
2018 NY Slip Op 08102
Decided on November 27, 2018
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on November 27, 2018
Renwick, J.P., Tom, Webber, Kahn, Moulton, JJ.

7735 2873/15

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Pedro Acosta, Defendant-Appellant.


Seymour W. James, Jr., The Legal Aid Society, New York (Heidi Bota of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Sabrina Margret Bierer of counsel), for respondent.



An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Jill Konviser, J.), rendered March 22, 2016,

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: NOVEMBER 27, 2018

CLERK

Counsel for appellant is referred to

§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate

Division, First Department.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Acosta, 2018 NY Slip Op 8102 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

2018 NY Slip Op 8102 (People v. Acosta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 431
New York JUD § 431