People v. Acosta

30 A.D.3d 1142, 815 N.Y.S.2d 463
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Acosta. Read the opinion of the Court — 19 A.D.3d 1041

Opinion

Judgments, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles H. Solomon, J.), rendered April 8, 2004, convicting defendant, upon his pleas of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second and third degrees, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 4 years to life and 4 to 12 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea after a suitable inquiry in which defendant received an adequate opportunity to be heard (see People v Frederick, 45 NY2d 520 [1978]). The court was fully familiar with the case, including the plea negotiations and allocution, and was able to [1143]*1143make an informed decision. The record establishes that defendant’s plea was knowing, intelligent and voluntary, and that his claims of coercion were directly contradicted by statements he made at the time of the plea. Concur—Andrias, J.E, Friedman, Sullivan, Nardelli and Malone, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Acosta, 30 A.D.3d 1142, 815 N.Y.S.2d 463 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

30 A.D.3d 1142 (People v. Acosta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Frederick
382 N.E.2d 1332 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)