People v. Acosta

260 A.D.2d 495, 686 N.Y.S.2d 332, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3824
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Acosta. Read the opinion of the Court — 249 A.D.2d 161

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered March 9, 1998, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention concerning the sentencing court’s comments is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]). The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mangano, P. J., Santucci, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Acosta, 260 A.D.2d 495, 686 N.Y.S.2d 332, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3824 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

260 A.D.2d 495 (People v. Acosta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Kazepis
101 A.D.2d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)