People v. Acero

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Acero

146 A.D.2d 787, 538 N.Y.S.2d 470, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 882

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 30, 1989

StatusPublished

This text of 146 A.D.2d 787 (People v. Acero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Acero, 146 A.D.2d 787, 538 N.Y.S.2d 470, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 882 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Baker, J), rendered August 4, 1987, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress statements made by him to law enforcement authorities.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed for reasons stated by Justice Baker in his memorandum decision denying that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress certain statements.

We decline to adopt, however, that portion of the decision which indicates that the defendant was entitled to the protections provided juvenile delinquents under the Family Court Act (see, Family Ct Act § 305.2; People v Bonaparte, 130 AD2d 673, lv denied 70 NY2d 703; People v Ward, 95 AD2d 351), and we leave that question for determination in another case. Brown, J. P., Lawrence, Eiber and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Baker, J), rendered August 4, 1987, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress statements made by him to law enforcement authorities.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed for reasons stated by Justice Baker in his memorandum decision denying that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress certain statements.

We decline to adopt, however, that portion of the decision which indicates that the defendant was entitled to the protections provided juvenile delinquents under the Family Court Act (see, Family Ct Act § 305.2; People v Bonaparte, 130 AD2d 673, lv denied 70 NY2d 703; People v Ward, 95 AD2d 351), and we leave that question for determination in another case. Brown, J. P., Lawrence, Eiber and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

146 A.D.2d 787, 538 N.Y.S.2d 470, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 882, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-acero-nyappdiv-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack