People v. Abreu (Jesus)
This text of People v. Abreu (Jesus) (People v. Abreu (Jesus)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
against
Jesus Abreu Defendant-Appellant.
Defendant appeals, from the judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Ushir Pandit-Durant, J.), rendered June 6, 2016, convicting him, upon a plea of guilty, of unlawful possession of marihuana, and sentencing him to a fine of $75.
Per Curiam.
Judgment of conviction (Ushir Pandit-Durant, J.), rendered June 6, 2016, affirmed.
We are unpersuaded that the bargained-for sentence imposed - payment of a $75.00 fine - was unduly harsh or excessive and find no extraordinary circumstances warranting a reduction of the sentence in the interest of justice (see People v Fair, 33 AD3d 558, 558 [2006], lv denied 8 NY3d 945 [2007]). "Ordinarily... where defendant effects a plea bargain and receives the precise sentence that was promised, he should not later be heard to complain that he received what he bargained for" (id. at 558, quoting People v Chambers, 123 AD2d 270, 270 [1986]). Although defendant claims that he is indigent, he never sought relief from the fine by way of a motion pursuant to CPL § 420.10(5) for resentencing (see People v Toledo, 101 AD3d 571 [2012], lv denied 21 NY3d 947 [2013]), and indeed, has paid the fine.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: June 13, 2017
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
People v. Abreu (Jesus), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-abreu-jesus-nyappterm-2017.