People v. Abraham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Abraham

162 A.D.2d 964, 559 N.Y.S.2d 204, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9697

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 22, 1990

StatusPublished

This text of 162 A.D.2d 964 (People v. Abraham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Abraham, 162 A.D.2d 964, 559 N.Y.S.2d 204, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9697 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant’s contentions that the prosecution failed to disprove defendant’s agency defense (see, People v Lam Lek Chong, 45 NY2d 64, 74-75, cert denied 439 US 935) and that his concurrent sentences of 4 to 12 years are harsh and excessive. (Appeal from judgment of Oneida County Court, Aison, J.—criminal sale of controlled substance, third degree.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Green and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant’s contentions that the prosecution failed to disprove defendant’s agency defense (see, People v Lam Lek Chong, 45 NY2d 64, 74-75, cert denied 439 US 935) and that his concurrent sentences of 4 to 12 years are harsh and excessive. (Appeal from judgment of Oneida County Court, Aison, J.—criminal sale of controlled substance, third degree.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Green and Balio, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

162 A.D.2d 964, 559 N.Y.S.2d 204, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-abraham-nyappdiv-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack