People v. Abdurrahman
This text of 135 A.D.2d 721 (People v. Abdurrahman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lagaña, J.), rendered September 12, 1985, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
That branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress a gun and shells seized from him was properly denied (see, People v Marin, 91 AD2d 616, 617).
The sentence imposed upon the defendant, which was the minimum prescribed by law was clearly not excessive.
We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions contained in his supplemental pro se brief and find them to be without merit (see, e.g., People v Almodovar, 62 NY2d 126, 130-131). Mollen, P. J., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Harwood, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
135 A.D.2d 721, 522 N.Y.S.2d 621, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52660, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-abdurrahman-nyappdiv-1987.