People v. Abbott

2021 NY Slip Op 00854, 138 N.Y.S.3d 369, 191 A.D.3d 796
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 10, 2021
DocketInd. No. 18-00124
StatusPublished

This text of 2021 NY Slip Op 00854 (People v. Abbott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Abbott, 2021 NY Slip Op 00854, 138 N.Y.S.3d 369, 191 A.D.3d 796 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

People v Abbott (2021 NY Slip Op 00854)
People v Abbott
2021 NY Slip Op 00854
Decided on February 10, 2021
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on February 10, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
BETSY BARROS
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON
ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.

2018-10520
(Ind. No. 18-00124)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Anthony J. Abbott, appellant.


Philip H. Schnabel, Chester, NY, for appellant.

David M. Hoovler, District Attorney, Goshen, NY (Andrew R. Kass of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (William L. DeProspo, J.), rendered August 30, 2018, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the People's contention, the defendant's purported appeal waiver was invalid. The County Court failed to ascertain that the defendant "understood the nature of the appellate rights being waived" and the consequences of waiving those rights (People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545, 559; see People v Daniel, 188 AD3d 908; People v Iglesias, 187 AD3d 785; People v Cobian, 186 AD3d 851). Accordingly, the purported appeal waiver does not preclude review of the defendant's excessive sentence claim.

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see CPL 470.15[6][b]; People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

RIVERA, J.P., BARROS, CONNOLLY, BRATHWAITE NELSON and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Cobian
2020 NY Slip Op 04759 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
People v. Iglesias
2020 NY Slip Op 05527 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
People v. Daniel
2020 NY Slip Op 06542 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2021 NY Slip Op 00854, 138 N.Y.S.3d 369, 191 A.D.3d 796, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-abbott-nyappdiv-2021.