People of the Territory v. March

40 P. 708, 11 Utah 432, 40 P.R. 708, 1895 Utah LEXIS 74
Utah Supreme Court·Decided June 12, 1895·No. No. 595·Published

Opinion

Smith, J.:

This case is in all respects like the case of U. S. v. Duggins (just decided), ante, p. 430, 40 Pac. 707, except, that the offense for which this defendant was indicted, tried, and convicted was a different, offense from that in the Duggins case. All the matters assigned as errors in. the brief of defendant are decisions made upon the trial, in matters of law. No attempt was ever made to save exceptions to such a ruling, by bill of exceptions or otherwise. Under such circumstances there is nothing for this court to review. The judgment of the district court is. affirmed, and the cause remanded to that court, with, directions to enforce its judgment.

Meeeitt, C. J., and Bartch, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People of the Territory v. March, 40 P. 708, 11 Utah 432, 40 P.R. 708, 1895 Utah LEXIS 74 (Utah 1895).

40 P. 708 (People of the Territory v. March) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Duggins
40 P. 707 (Utah Supreme Court, 1895)