People of State of New York v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People of State of New York v. Williams

18 A.D.3d 376, 795 N.Y.S.2d 445, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5683

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 26, 2005

StatusPublished

This text of 18 A.D.3d 376 (People of State of New York v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People of State of New York v. Williams, 18 A.D.3d 376, 795 N.Y.S.2d 445, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5683 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Micki A. Scherer, J.), rendered December 4, 2002, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of three years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal forecloses review of his present claims (People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 9-10 [1989]). Were we to find that defendant did not make a valid waiver, we would find that the court properly exercised its discretion in denying youthful offender treatment, and we would find no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur — Friedman, J.P., Sullivan, Gonzalez, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Micki A. Scherer, J.), rendered December 4, 2002, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of three years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal forecloses review of his present claims (People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 9-10 [1989]). Were we to find that defendant did not make a valid waiver, we would find that the court properly exercised its discretion in denying youthful offender treatment, and we would find no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur — Friedman, J.P., Sullivan, Gonzalez, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 A.D.3d 376, 795 N.Y.S.2d 445, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5683, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-of-state-of-new-york-v-williams-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack