People of State of California v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency

775 F.2d 998
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 31, 1985·No. 84-2450·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

775 F.2d 998

The PEOPLE OF the STATE OF CALIFORNIA ex rel, John VAN DE
KAMP, Attorney General of the State of California,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
The TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING AGENCY, a separate legal entity
created by Bi-State Compact, Defendant-Appellant,
Tahoe Shorezone Representation, a Nevada corporation,
Intervenor-Appellant.

No. 84-2450.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted May 15, 1985.
Decided July 22, 1985.
As Amended Oct. 31, 1985.

John K. Van de Kamp, Atty. Gen., N. Gregory Taylor, Asst. Atty. Gen., Richard M. Skinner, Deputy Atty. Gen., Sacramento, Cal., E. Clement Shute, Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

William T. Chidlaw, Law Offices of William T. Chidlaw, Sacramento, Cal., for intervenor-appellant.

Prior Report: 766 F.2d 1319 (9th Cir.1985).

Before ANDERSON AND CANBY, Circuit Judges and NIELSEN,* District Judge.

ORDER

The panel orders the following amendment to its opinion in this case, filed July 22, 1985:

Replace the language at page 9, lines 16-18, which states:

The proposed TRPA Regional Plan will require the installation of best management practices on all shorezone property.

with the following:

TRPA's goals include ultimately putting best management practices in place for all land in the Lake Tahoe region.

The petition for rehearing is denied.

*

The Honorable Leland C. Nielsen, United States District Judge for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People of State of California v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, 775 F.2d 998 (9th Cir. 1985).

775 F.2d 998 (People of State of California v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carrillo v. Schneider Logistics, Inc.
823 F. Supp. 2d 1040 (C.D. California, 2011)
Center for Food Safety v. Vilsack
753 F. Supp. 2d 1051 (N.D. California, 2010)
Miller v. Carlson
768 F. Supp. 1331 (N.D. California, 1991)
Muckleshoot Indian Tribe v. Hall
698 F. Supp. 1504 (W.D. Washington, 1988)
United States v. Larry Lee Taylor
821 F.2d 1377 (Ninth Circuit, 1987)