People of San Francisco v. Doe

48 Cal. 560, 1874 Cal. LEXIS 199
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1874·No. No. 4,110·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

We think that in proceedings to recover upon a street assessment, it is necessary that the complaint should allege that the defendants are the owners, or have some interest in the premises sought to be charged with the alleged lien. By the thirteenth section of the Act, it is expressly provided in terms that actions for the collection of any delinquent street assessment shall be brought * * ' * “against the owners and all persons having any interest [562] therein;” and unless the defendants are alleged to be persons of that character, there would appear to be no reason to implead them as defendants, and no authority to enforce the lien in the absence of the real parties in interest.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People of San Francisco v. Doe, 48 Cal. 560, 1874 Cal. LEXIS 199 (Cal. 1874).

48 Cal. 560 (People of San Francisco v. Doe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Driscoll v. Howard
63 Cal. 438 (California Supreme Court, 1883)
Clark v. Porter
53 Cal. 409 (California Supreme Court, 1879)
Bays v. Lapidge
52 Cal. 481 (California Supreme Court, 1877)
Hancock v. Bowman
49 Cal. 413 (California Supreme Court, 1874)