People of Michigan v. Vincent Edward Hudson
This text of People of Michigan v. Vincent Edward Hudson (People of Michigan v. Vincent Edward Hudson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
May 28, 2013 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
146577 Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, David F. Viviano, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices
v SC: 146577 COA: 303437 Oakland CC: 2010-234459-FH VINCENT EDWARD HUDSON, Defendant-Appellant.
____________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 29, 2012 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We DIRECT the Oakland County Prosecuting Attorney to answer the application for leave to appeal within 28 days after the date of this order. The prosecutor shall include among the issues to be answered whether the evidence seized from the defendant when he was on his patio in his backyard was seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment, whether the Court of Appeals correctly concluded that the exclusionary rule should not be applied, and whether defense counsel performed deficiently in failing to move to suppress the evidence.
The application for leave to appeal remains pending.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. May 28, 2013 h0520 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
People of Michigan v. Vincent Edward Hudson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-of-michigan-v-vincent-edward-hudson-mich-2013.