People of Michigan v. Thomas Lee Wingard

CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedJune 21, 2017
Docket153290
StatusPublished

This text of People of Michigan v. Thomas Lee Wingard (People of Michigan v. Thomas Lee Wingard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People of Michigan v. Thomas Lee Wingard, (Mich. 2017).

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

June 21, 2017 Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

153290 Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Kurtis T. Wilder, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 153290 COA: 323316 Wayne CC: 13-009150-FC THOMAS LEE WINGARD, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of November 23, 2016, the prosecuting attorney was directed to answer the application for leave to appeal the January 14, 2016 judgment of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court, the answer having been received, the application for leave to appeal is again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE that part of the Court of Appeals judgment addressing the defendant’s claims under Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966), and we REMAND this case to the Wayne Circuit Court. The circuit court shall, in accordance with Administrative Order 2003-03, determine whether the defendant is indigent and, if so, appoint counsel to represent the defendant at an evidentiary hearing pursuant to People v Ginther, 390 Mich 436 (1973), at which the circuit court shall determine whether trial counsel was ineffective for failing to move to suppress the defendant’s confession under Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966), and Missouri v Seibert, 542 US 600 (2004). In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. June 21, 2017 p0614 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miranda v. Arizona
384 U.S. 436 (Supreme Court, 1966)
Missouri v. Seibert
542 U.S. 600 (Supreme Court, 2004)
People v. Ginther
212 N.W.2d 922 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
People of Michigan v. Thomas Lee Wingard, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-of-michigan-v-thomas-lee-wingard-mich-2017.