People of Michigan v. Stanley Jerome Brown

Michigan Supreme Court

People of Michigan v. Stanley Jerome Brown

DecidedApril 28, 2008

Docket134137

StatusPublished

This text of People of Michigan v. Stanley Jerome Brown (People of Michigan v. Stanley Jerome Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People of Michigan v. Stanley Jerome Brown, (Mich. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

April 28, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh 134137 Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee, v SC: 134137 COA: 274184 Wayne CC: 02-006678-01 STANLEY JEROME BROWN, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 14, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered. We DIRECT the Wayne County Prosecuting Attorney to answer the application for leave to appeal within 28 days after the date of this order. The prosecutor shall address whether the defendant's trial attorney was ineffective for failing to procure staff activity logs before trial. The prosecutor shall also address whether staff activity logs and the victim's deposition testimony from the civil case, to the extent that the deposition testimony is inconsistent with the victim's prior testimony, constitute new evidence that could justify a retrial under the standard for relief applicable to a motion for relief from judgment.

The application for leave to appeal remains pending.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. April 28, 2008 _________________________________________ d0421 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

April 28, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh 134137 Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee, v SC: 134137 COA: 274184 Wayne CC: 02-006678-01 STANLEY JEROME BROWN, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 14, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered. We DIRECT the Wayne County Prosecuting Attorney to answer the application for leave to appeal within 28 days after the date of this order. The prosecutor shall address whether the defendant's trial attorney was ineffective for failing to procure staff activity logs before trial. The prosecutor shall also address whether staff activity logs and the victim's deposition testimony from the civil case, to the extent that the deposition testimony is inconsistent with the victim's prior testimony, constitute new evidence that could justify a retrial under the standard for relief applicable to a motion for relief from judgment.

The application for leave to appeal remains pending.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. April 28, 2008 _________________________________________ d0421 Clerk

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

People of Michigan v. Stanley Jerome Brown, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-of-michigan-v-stanley-jerome-brown-mich-2008.