People of Michigan v. Ronald Lee Foster

Michigan Supreme Court

People of Michigan v. Ronald Lee Foster

908 N.W.2d 307, 501 Mich. 1024

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 21, 2018

DocketSC: 156088; COA: 336811

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 908 N.W.2d 307 (People of Michigan v. Ronald Lee Foster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People of Michigan v. Ronald Lee Foster, 908 N.W.2d 307, 501 Mich. 1024 (Mich. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 12, 2017 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Wayne Circuit Court for the appointment of new appellate counsel to represent the defendant as on direct appellate review. See Halbert v. Michigan , 545 U.S. 605 , 125 S.Ct. 2582 , 162 L.Ed.2d 552 (2005). The record reflects that defendant's appellate counsel did not file an application for leave to appeal, seek any other relief on the defendant's behalf, or move to withdraw based on the attorney's determination, after a thorough review of the trial record, that the appeal was wholly frivolous. Thus, through no fault of the defendant, he lost the right to seek leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals on direct review. On remand, new appellate counsel, once appointed, may file an application for leave to appeal in the Court of Appeals for consideration under the standard for direct appeals, and/or any appropriate postconviction motions in the circuit court, within six months of the date of the circuit court's order appointing counsel.

Costs are imposed against the attorney, Tracie Gittleman, in the amount of $500, to be paid to the Clerk of this Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 12, 2017 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Wayne Circuit Court for the appointment of new appellate counsel to represent the defendant as on direct appellate review. See Halbert v. Michigan , 545 U.S. 605 , 125 S.Ct. 2582 , 162 L.Ed.2d 552 (2005). The record reflects that defendant's appellate counsel did not file an application for leave to appeal, seek any other relief on the defendant's behalf, or move to withdraw based on the attorney's determination, after a thorough review of the trial record, that the appeal was wholly frivolous. Thus, through no fault of the defendant, he lost the right to seek leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals on direct review. On remand, new appellate counsel, once appointed, may file an application for leave to appeal in the Court of Appeals for consideration under the standard for direct appeals, and/or any appropriate postconviction motions in the circuit court, within six months of the date of the circuit court's order appointing counsel.

Costs are imposed against the attorney, Tracie Gittleman, in the amount of $500, to be paid to the Clerk of this Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

908 N.W.2d 307, 501 Mich. 1024, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-of-michigan-v-ronald-lee-foster-mich-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack