People of Michigan v. Ricky Dale Jack
This text of People of Michigan v. Ricky Dale Jack (People of Michigan v. Ricky Dale Jack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
May 26, 2021 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
162767 & (35) Brian K. Zahra David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Elizabeth M. Welch, Plaintiff-Appellant, Justices
v SC: 162767 COA: 354524 Ingham CC: 18-001048-FC RICKY DALE JACK, Defendant-Appellee.
_____________________________________/
On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration of the motion to stay is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the March 11, 2021 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to stay the precedential effect of the published Court of Appeals opinion is DENIED as moot.
ZAHRA, J., would direct oral argument on the application.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. May 26, 2021 b0519 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
People of Michigan v. Ricky Dale Jack, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-of-michigan-v-ricky-dale-jack-mich-2021.