People of Michigan v. Raymond Charles Pierson
This text of 913 N.W.2d 661 (People of Michigan v. Raymond Charles Pierson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 12, 2017 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.305(H)(1).
We further ORDER the Washtenaw Circuit Court, in accordance with Administrative Order 2003-03, to determine whether the defendant is indigent and, if so, to appoint the State Appellate Defender Office, if feasible, to represent the defendant in this Court. If this appointment is not feasible, the trial court shall, within the same time frame, appoint other counsel to represent the defendant in this Court.
The appellant shall file a supplemental brief within 42 days of the date of the order appointing counsel addressing whether: (1) defendant was denied the right to a fair trial when the trial court informed the jury that his confession to police had already been reviewed by the court and had been held admissible, see
People v. Kincaid
,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
913 N.W.2d 661, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-of-michigan-v-raymond-charles-pierson-mich-2018.