People of Michigan v. Michael Lamar Patrick

Michigan Supreme Court

People of Michigan v. Michael Lamar Patrick

DecidedMay 29, 2019

Docket157735

StatusPublished

This text of People of Michigan v. Michael Lamar Patrick (People of Michigan v. Michael Lamar Patrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People of Michigan v. Michael Lamar Patrick, (Mich. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

May 29, 2019 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem 157735 & (26) Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Megan K. Cavanagh, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 157735 COA: 340779 Oakland CC: 2014-249081-FC MICHAEL LAMAR PATRICK, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of December 19, 2018, the prosecuting attorney was directed to answer the application for leave to appeal the March 12, 2018 order of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court, the answer having been received, the application for leave to appeal is again considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The defendant-appellant’s document entitled “Explanation for Delay in Filing” the late reply is treated as a motion to extend the time for filing the reply and is GRANTED.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. May 29, 2019 s0522 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

May 29, 2019 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem 157735 & (26) Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Megan K. Cavanagh, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 157735 COA: 340779 Oakland CC: 2014-249081-FC MICHAEL LAMAR PATRICK, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of December 19, 2018, the prosecuting attorney was directed to answer the application for leave to appeal the March 12, 2018 order of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court, the answer having been received, the application for leave to appeal is again considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The defendant-appellant’s document entitled “Explanation for Delay in Filing” the late reply is treated as a motion to extend the time for filing the reply and is GRANTED.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. May 29, 2019 s0522 Clerk

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

People of Michigan v. Michael Lamar Patrick, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-of-michigan-v-michael-lamar-patrick-mich-2019.