People of Michigan v. Marc Curtis Minter
This text of People of Michigan v. Marc Curtis Minter (People of Michigan v. Marc Curtis Minter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
February 13, 2019 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
159103 & (12)(13) David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem
Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Richard H. Bernstein Plaintiff-Appellee, Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices v SC: 159103 COA: 347523 Wayne CC: 17-007369-FC MARC CURTIS MINTER, Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the motions for immediate consideration and to waive transcript requirement are GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the February 6, 2019 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because, while the assistance of a forensic pathologist may be a required component of the defense in this case, see People v Kennedy, 502 Mich 206 (2018), Ake v Oklahoma, 470 US 68 (1985), the unavailability of the properly noticed forensic pathologist, Dr. Karl Williams, is only speculative at this point. The motion to stay is DENIED.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. February 13, 2019 t0226 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
People of Michigan v. Marc Curtis Minter, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-of-michigan-v-marc-curtis-minter-mich-2019.