People of Michigan v. Lonnie James Arnold

CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 20, 2020
Docket160046
StatusPublished

This text of People of Michigan v. Lonnie James Arnold (People of Michigan v. Lonnie James Arnold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People of Michigan v. Lonnie James Arnold, (Mich. 2020).

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

March 20, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

160046 David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Richard H. Bernstein Plaintiff-Appellee, Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices v SC: 160046 COA: 325407 Monroe CC: 13-040406-FH LONNIE JAMES ARNOLD, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 11, 2019 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall include among the issues to be briefed: (1) whether indecent exposure by a sexually delinquent person is a distinct felony “enumerated” in the Michigan Penal Code and subject to the sentencing guidelines, or whether the offense is subject to the sentencing guidelines regardless because it is set forth in MCL 777.16q as a listed felony; (2) whether, when the legislative sentencing guidelines provide for a penalty that is inconsistent with the penalty provided in the Penal Code for an offense, the sentencing guidelines are an amendment or repeal of inconsistent provisions of the Penal Code by implication such that the guidelines control, and if so, whether this comports with Const 1963, art 4, § 25; and (3) whether the rule of lenity is implicated, see People v Hall, 499 Mich 446, 458 n 38 (2016).

The time allowed for oral argument shall be 20 minutes for each side. MCR 7.314(B)(1).

The Criminal Defense Attorneys of Michigan and the Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. March 20, 2020 p0317 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Hall
880 N.W.2d 785 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
People of Michigan v. Lonnie James Arnold, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-of-michigan-v-lonnie-james-arnold-mich-2020.